Thursday, January 11, 2007

Our World Needs a Mother

I recently attended a lecture by USC Professor of International Relations, Ann Tickner. The lecture included an exericse in which those attending were told to describe male/masculine qualities in juxtoposition to female/feminine qualities. She then asked the audience, who were prodimently women, to state which qualities they saw in themselves or wish to see in themselves. I was disheartened to see the majority of women identifying with the "male qualities" which included but was not limited to income earner, career oriented, controlled, leader, autonomy, reason and power. One female in the audience went so far as to rebuke any female who would ever want to identify with feminine qualities such as passivity, soft spokenness and indecisive. It blew my mind that 1) she chose the qualities of femininity with the most negative connotations and 2) held reverence for male qualities and a glimmer of shame towards female qualities. To address my first conundrum I plea for all to think twice about the judgement of qualities. Aggressiveness is considered comendable in a work environment while passivity is condemened. Maybe passivity is wise while aggressiveness is foolish? Aggressivenss in foriegn policy for instance has left the US a debt and a pariah in the New World Order. Passiviity, the feminine quality may have served us better, and therefore should not be considered negative. And what of autonomy? I would think any man or woman who could think he or she could make it in this world alone or independent has failed to understand how greatness was achieved. No great leader ever achieved success alone, not Gandhi nor Mother Theresa, nor any great president. Many women feel that they must adopt masculine qualities to be successful in our male dominent world of today, but I question the need for leaders seeking more power and money or policy based on toughness and reason. In my opinion, the world is in need of the so-called feminine qualities of empathy and caring. I plea for all women to develop the qualities in them regardless of their gender associations, but I plea more for any man or woman to recognize that maybe our male chavuanistic world is need of a mother of unconditional love and fierce maternal protectiveness.

2 comments:

Vanessa said...

Interesting point, but I don't see why only women bear the responsibility in parenthood. I think that the world needs PARENTS, not a mother. Also, what constitute male and female "qualities" are social constructions. If passivity is something you believe to be positive, then why are you wishing it only on women? Perhaps you should look into why more men don't have those qualities...

Truth on the Rocks said...

I obviously did not make one point clear as both you and a respected family member have made similar comments. Gender is a social construct. Societies dictate what qualities are "masculine" and which are "feminine." In our society, passivity is attributed to the female , while activity, or aggressiveness, is attributed to the male. The point I wish to make is that female's need not act with "masculine" qualities due to the patriarchal structure in order to be successful. A female can be just as successful by acting with "feminine" qualities. In essence, the qualities of passivity or agressiveness are simply qualities that our society has gendered. Both men and women can have either quality. I do not wish passivity to be an attribute to solely men or women, nor do I solely believe the attribute to be positive or negative. I am simply trying to make the point that 1) "masculine" qualities are considered better by some in our society because of the patriarchal structure and 2) this world is lacking "feminine" qualities that could act as agents towards creating a more peaceful world.